Happy Monday, everyone! As summer looms ever nearer, the movie season is charging forward. A number of the movies that are out or coming out have their origins in books, and because of this we thought that it would be fun to talk about our favorite movie adaptations of books. Be it because the adaptation was truthful, captured the spirit, or outdid the book altogether. So without further ado, here are our top five favorite book to movie adaptations!
I’ll be frank. The book “Jaws” isn’t very good. But that is why the movie is so fabulous. Spielberg took some so-so source material and turned it into a taut and scary suspense film with some really great performances from Roy Scheider, Richard Dreyfuss, and Robert Shaw, who blows the film out of the water with the amazing U.S.S. Indianapolis Speech.
“The Silence of the Lambs” is easily one of my very favorite thrillers of all time. The movie adaptation brings the story to life, and I would argue even improves upon it much like “Jaws” did. You are so invested in Clarice Starling’s journey, played to a T by Jodie Foster, and you can’t help be repulsed yet mesmerized by Anthony Hopkins as Hannibal Lecter. And Ted Levine is extremely underrated as the twisted Buffalo Bill. A great film from a great book.
“Carrie” gave this social pariah a fun revenge fantasy to indulge in when she was in middle school, though I didn’t see the dePalma movie until high school. While I feel that the newest remake captures more of the essence of the book, Sissy Spacek is the perfect Carrie White, both a victim and then (arguably) a monster. I mean, who hasn’t seen or heard of the notorious prom scene where Carrie gets her revenge on Chamberlain High? Team Carrie, though. Forever.
Maybe I’m cheating, but I am putting all three “Lord of the Rings” films into this because, let’s be real. “The Lord of the Rings” is a huge epic, and is meant to be one story. Peter Jackson undertook a daunting task with a beloved fantasy, arguably the greatest high fantasy epic of all time, and made it into a fabulous film series. From the casting to the music to the special effects and plotting (Gollum in particular being incredibly revolutionary and tragically fleshed out), everything was done with care. “The Lord of the Rings” is my favorite book of all time, and I was pleased with what he did with it (Arwen stuff aside).
“Clueless” is one of my all-time favorite movies, and believe it or not it is based on one of Jane Austen’s books, “Emma.” And even though it takes place in 1990s Beverly Hills as opposed to Regency Era English countryside, “Clueless” is considered to be at its heart the most faithful adaptation of the novel. Cher Horowitz is a three dimensional heroine who you want to root for, and she is so very Emma even if her concerns are less about English manners and society and more about high school, popularity, and her frustrating step brother Josh. Easily my favorite movie adaptation of a book, even if it isn’t all that conventional.
Kate mentioned “Life of Pi” in our movie review of “The Jungle Book”, but it has to be included in this list, too. This book was said to be “unfilmable” for years, and I can understand why. In the hands of the wrong director, the beautiful inner journey and poignancy of the narrative could have been lost in place of a cheesy, shipwreck movie with a tiger for added flare. Ang Lee not only captures the tonal resonance of the book, but his film is absolutely gorgeous.The isolation, beauty, and drama of the story is perfectly captured while also retaining the deeper messages about life and faith from the book.
Jodie Foster’s second appearance on this list! Apparently she knows how to pick her book/film adaptations! I read this book in highschool, after having already seen the movie, one of the few times I’ve read/watched in this order as I make it a general rule to try and read most books before their movie adaptations. But in this case, the order worked fine! While there are some changes between the book and the movie, additional characters and such, the tone of the book is captured perfectly in the movie. Again, an impressive feat considering that the more subtle aspects of discovery and humanity could have been easily lost in translation.
Ah, “The Princess Bride,” my first love. My younger sister and I would watch this movie obsessively. It wasn’t until several years later that I even realized there was a book! What an exciting discovery! And then to find that it was even more hilarious and awesome than the movie. The fact that I had Cary Elwes as a mental image for Wesley already just helped matters. Much of the success in translation comes down to the fact that the author, William Goldman, also wrote the screenplay for the movie. So while the story is shortened and adjusted for film, the parody, tone, and witty dialogue match exactly.
Like almost every kid, I had a dinosaur phase, and the fact that “Jurassic Park” sat firmly in the adult section at the library did nothing to dissuade me. I’ve re-read it since, which is good since most of the science went completely over my head as a kid, and it’s still a fun adventure. However, this is one where I would say the movie is even stronger. The book is much more interested in the science and technology of the park, and the characters, while interesting, were a bit flat. It’s the perfect structure for a movie,however, and it’s easy to see how the film was built upon this strong foundation. But with a re-focus on action and markedly more fleshed central characters, the movie surpasses the book and is one of my all time favorites to this day.
I think it should be noted that both Kate and I listed a Jane Austen adaptation as our number one pick completely independent of each other. But really, is anyone surprised? Jane Austen is my hero. Also, this could be considered a bit of a cheat since the BBC version is a 6 hour miniseries rather than a true film adaptation. But if Kate got “Lord of the Rings,” I get this. So, given its length, this film basically is the book on screen. Much of the dialogue is directly lifted, almost all of the significant scenes and characters are included, and other than rushing the ending a bit, in my opinion, it is practically perfect in every way. Colin Firth is universally acknowledge as the definitive Mr. Darcy, and Jennifer Ehle should not be forgotten as my hands down favorite onscreen version of Elizabeth Bennett. She captures Lizzie’s spunk and wit, without losing the propriety and grace of the character (something that Kiera Knightly’s take completely lacked, in my opinion, and a balance the character needs to truly represent Lizzie as a woman worthy of admiration and esteem in her era).
So, there you have it! What are your favorite film adaptations based on books?